At 09:39 AM 3/18/98 -0500, Lucky Leavell wrote: >Well, I have OI2.0 up and running and am getting ready to migrate my data >from OI1.1. I was wondering about trying, say, a 4K page size at least on >some user tables as several of the new features (e.g., row level locking) >are only available for larger page sizes. ... I've been experimenting with using 2k and 8k pages. So far, I've used 8k pages mainly for intermediate temp tables. The results so far are encouraging. In one test which did a fair amount of temp table flailing with reasonably wide rows (such that only 1 row per page fit on a 2k page), I can speed things up by over 1/3 just by using 8k pages. YMMV of course but it's a good start. So far I have not heard of many bugs related to large pages, in the 9712 release. I would counsel caution, though; I'm not sure I would move my key transaction tables to >2k yet without some pretty extensive testing, including crash/recovery testing. Maybe in a few weeks after some more production sites have beat up 2.0/9712 a bit. Karl R. Schendel, Jr. K/B Computer Associates schendel@kbcomputer.com Ingres and Unix Expertise NAIUA Member-At-Large atlarge@naiua.org Lucky, Make sure you run GenLevel 9712 + patches or you will encounter some "interesting" problems with cursors and larger page sizes. 3GL/4GL programs using cursors will fail with GCA errors where the terminal monitor (which uses select loops) will function just fine on the same query. Cheers, Michael Leo mleo@cariboulake.com mal@visi.com Caribou Lake Software http://www.cariboulake.com Java/RDBMS/Ingres Solutions St. Paul, Minnesota (612) 323-9713
© William Yuan 2000
Email William